Rene Engelhard wrote:
> No, it isn't. -l10n-en-us *IS* needed otherwise you'll experience
> crashes in some situations. AT least that was the case once and
> I don't want to expose users to have that risk again (see 1.9.15-1's
^^
125
> This bug is stricrly speaking a non-bug and I might merge -l10n-en-us
> back into -common someday...But this needs upgrade testing and I fear people will get seriously confused when their -l10n-en from sarge will just be removed.. Regards, Rene
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
