Hello, On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 07:18:54PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > Then this is quite a bad example. Files in */bin usually do not have > an extension (IIRC policy mandates that at least not extension for > indication of the scripting language be used), so I would be > suspicious if a file shipped something in /usr/bin with an extension. > Can't we take the common case for /etc-files (thats how I understood > the man page at least), so something like: > > "To divert all copies of a I</etc/foo.conf> to I</etc/bar.conf>, i.e. directs > " > "all packages providing /etc/foo.conf to install it as /etc/bar.conf, > "performing the rename if required:" > > "dpkg-divert --divert /etc/bar.conf --rename /etc/foo.conf"
I kept /usr/bin/example.foo and /usr/bin/example, but reversed the arguments, so it should be OK. > Do you supply me with an updated po file once you applied these > changes? Thanks. Here it is. Kind Regards, -- Nekral
dpkg-divert.8_de.po.bz2
Description: Binary data
