On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:47:42PM -0500, Scott M. Dier wrote: > This patch 'works for me' and re-uses the (i feel) applicable shadow > doesn't have to be valid/existing option.
> diff -ur pam-0.76/debian/changelog pam-0.76-new/debian/changelog > --- pam-0.76/debian/changelog 2005-08-31 16:00:35.267474000 -0500 > +++ pam-0.76-new/debian/changelog 2005-08-31 15:55:45.857647000 -0500 > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > +pam (0.76-22umn1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * Ported patches from newer version of Linux-PAM to support NIS > + password changing in the pam_unix module. > + > + -- Scott M. Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:30:08 -0500 > + You haven't said what version it's backported from, and you've applied it against the sarge version of the pam package. This patch is useless to me; PAM is currently at 0.79 in etch, and I don't have any intention of trying to merge more individual patches from upstream into the Debian package when the patch set is already thoroughly unwieldly. If you can tell me the provenance of the patch, I can consider targetting an appropriate upstream version for etch instead. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
