Joey Hess writes: > I didn't see any debconf prompting, is it at low priority? I use the > standard priority, high.
No, medium. I agree with you that these really should be high, though, and I'll change them to that. In the event that someone is only looking at critical (or not using Debian, for that matter), I'll have it exit(0) after printing something perhaps a little more useful. Thanks. (I have some documentation rewriting to do still so all this probably won't happen till Mon). > You could also just use a defaults file with a thing that needs to be > frobbed to turn it on, although needing to remember to edit that could > be annoying. This is how I had it before debconfiscation, actually. Definitely annoying. > High is actually a valid priority for these questions, since they don't > have a reasonable default. Unless it's argued that not doing anything is > a reasonable default. Hopefully no one will step in and argue that :-) -- things change. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
