also sprach Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.28.1728 +0100]: > /etc/network/interfaces is not the right place to configure this > sort of thing since /e/n/i is just ifupdown's configuration file. > One can start a DHCP client independently of ifupdown, and > I presume that you want the nameserver address to be overridden in > that case too.
Yes, true. I guess what I want is netconf to become a standard, but for that we first have to work on it. It's my goal for next year's Debcamp at the latest. > Now the question is: should we implement "selective overrides" in > some way that makes it easier for the administrator to configure? > Should we just implement overrides, or should we implement a more > general feature? I think it would be okay to leave this bug as wontfix and concentrate instead on netconf. Are you still interested in working on that? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
