On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 03:47:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > > - Taking into account that I'm responsible for any mistakes in the config, > > I want it to be simple and well-tested, and the spfquery method is the one > > I'm best experienced with. > > > > - One of your concerns in README.Debian was that you didn't want an > > additional > > library dependency. There's more potential for bugs and maintainance > > work in > > a library that is always linked in, that in a configuration snippet that > > is > > disabled by default, so I kind of agree with you on this. > > > > - I'm not sure if the built-in library supports all the features. In > > particular, X-SPF-Guess headers, and other (more agressive) checks that > > I'm > > using myself but not putting into the package. > > Good reasons. Can you document these in README.Debian FAQ chapter, > like "why are you not using exim's built-in SPF interface?"
Committed. Let me know what you think. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
