On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 05:12:43PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:30:12AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > I might consider including SPF if there is a volunteer co-maintainer > > who is willing to do _ALL_ spf-related support including bug triage, > > upstream coordination, end-user support so that my increase in work > > load is zero or negative. At the moment, everything that has the > > potential to increase my work load is a non-option without being > > forced by the tech ctte or strong consensus on debian-devel that SPF > > should be enabled. > > Deal! I'm attaching a patch to add a (disabled by default) SPF template in > the debian config. I volunteer to do all the work that is derived from > appliing > this patch.
The patch is completely missing documentation. Is it possible to avoid using the ACL variable, which I'd like to save for the local admin's use? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
