>> Otherwise removing boot-floppies from unstable will mean that we'll be >> shipping boot-floppies in woody without corresponding source. Bug >> #225704 is also open about this. > >Is it still possible to do this, other than by waiting for etch to be >released, and therefore for woody to be removed from the archive? That won't be sufficient, thanks to archive.debian.org.
>(I >have no idea whether there's any non-painful way to update oldstable, >and oldstable still obviously has the "matching source" requirement). Sure. Put the boot-floppies source in a specified directory on ftp.debian.org / archive.debian.org, parallel to the disks-* directories. "disks-source" if you like. I already suggested this. Is any ftpmaster reading this? :-/ It's not reasonable for the "unstable" distribution to be the home of the boot-floppies source for woody, and it won't be legally sufficient after woody is removed from the archive and put on a different machine, and the solution is really quite simple. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
