On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 03:56:39PM +0200, Laurent Fousse wrote: > Did you try without -O0? It's not fair to say it's all I expect on > m68k, it's really that's it's all I could get with, let's say, a very > varying level of support for this architecture from gcc. I'll drop the > dependancy on gcc-3.4. If you have the opportunity to test without the > -O0, please report as well (apparently the lock down for developer > machines is still in effect).
gcc has been a problem for us lately. Right now I know there's a -O2 bug, which is why I was building some libs -O0. I'll test it out again when we get that fixed. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
