On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, David [iso-8859-1] Mart?nez Moreno wrote:
> El mi?rcoles, 1 de febrero de 2006 06:31, Ross Boylan escribi?:
> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 02:28:35PM +0100, Szakacsits Szabolcs wrote:
> [...]
>
> Hello, Ross. I am packaging the just released 1.13.1 version of
> ntfsprogs
> and I am taking care of open bug reports. Do you really have problems yet
> with this?
I'm collecting the reasons why ntfsresize may be slow on some systems here:
http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/ntfsresize.html#slow
All of them is either hardware or hardware setup problem.
Szaka
> > > > It appears that a lot of checks are taking place, so maybe this is a
> > > > good thing. But maybe not, hence this report.
> > >
> > > The checks are intentional and it can take such long time if the size of
> > > the $MFT is big enough or you have IDE DMA disabled (see, hdpram
> > > /dev/hda).
> >
> > Is hdpram a program? I can't find it, or any closely related spelling,
> > in the Debian archives.
>
> Well, Szaka really meant hdparm. If you are experiencing this issue
> yet,
> please run as root 'hdparm -i /dev/hda' and 'ntfsresize -i -f /dev/hda7', and
> post the results to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not seeing any problem with
> at least five different NTFS partitions, and ntfsclone reads them in one
> second or two.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>
> Ender.
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
