Philipp Sadleder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
> well, it's rather complicated. > udev names parport devices like /dev/parport_s_/[0..9], which is bad. Ah, typoed the name, sorry. > After applying the attached patch I could at least find the parport with > ./libieee1284_test. > > But also in libsane the paths for devices seem to be hardcoded. So > it would probably be the best solution to have udev name the parports > like before? I imagine it is possible to add a few more names in libsane, although I haven't seen the code. And, yes, please, go tell that to the udev folks. And udev 054 is just going to enter testing soon, which means it's going to break SANE just for fun. Fuck that shit. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
