Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | That is not the scenario we are talking about. The original version
> | fails as well. It works as root, sure. It does NOT work as NON-ROOT. And
> | it does not need to be root after simple modifications.
>
> I refrain from answering to other stuff until you understand and respect
> the difference between root and non-root usage. And "correctness" does
> not really have much to do with that, so measuring correctness depends on
> the personal POV.
As long as you fail to understand the difference between "it works" and "it
_seems_ to work in a particular case", it does not make sense to continue the
discussion with you.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
