Hi, > 2026年7月24日 05:02，Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> 写道： > > Hi Miao, > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 06:58:29PM +0800, Miao Wang wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> 2026年7月23日 00:14，Miao Wang <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo >>> >>>> 2026年7月23日 00:10，Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]> 写道： >>>> >>>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 07:50:40AM +0800, Miao Wang wrote: >>>>> Package: linux-modules-7.1.4+deb14-loong64 >>>>> Version: 7.1.4-1 >>>>> Severity: serious >>>>> Control: block -1 by 1142570 >>>>> >>>>> Dear maintainer, >>>>> >>>>> The kernel modules in 7.1.4+deb14 for loong64 is unable to be loaded by >>>>> the >>>>> kernel. The error in dmesg is: >>>>> >>>>> kmod: xxxx: Unsupport relocation type 102, please add its support. >>>>> >>>>> It is because a bug introduced in binutils, which inserts unexpected >>>>> relocation >>>>> entries into ld -r outputs. This has been fixed by upstream. >>>> >>>> So this is an issue in binutils only or what change has been applied >>>> to Linux? Is it applied in mainline and as well queued for 7.1.5? >>> >>> This is an issue in binutils only. No changes is needed to be done >>> in Linux and nothing can be done in Linux to work around this. >>> >> >> I saw you have reassigned the bug to binutils. I believe that although the >> problem lies in binutils, the compiled binary packages are seriously >> broken, preventing the system from booting. I wonder whether we should keep >> a bug open for linux to prevent the problematic version from migrating >> from unstable to testing according to the policy and convention. > > Yes I did so because the issue is not in src:linux. This would not > prevent in fact src:linux to migrate (which is a pity in itself since > we really want 7.1.4 to go to testing). But I talked to the release > team and they added a block hint so linux won't migrate until the > block lifted. > > Can you please respond here once binutils is fixed? >
Many thanks for your quick action. I have opened #1142570 to record this. I have seen patches for this in upstream, but there seems to be some confusion on this. Cheers, Miao Wang
