On Fri, Jun 05, 2026 at 03:49:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Aurélien COUDERC (2026-06-05 15:25:48) > > Le 5 juin 2026 14:30:35 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille <[email protected]> a écrit > > : > > >I'd like to propose some procedure for packages that appear to lack > > >active maintenance, but where no formal orphaning has taken place. > > > > how would that be different from the existing package salvaging procedure > > already documented at [1][2] ? > > As I understand it, salvaging is a process to adopt a package, whereas > this seems to be an interest in revoking a maintainer *without* > adoption.
...so orphaning + a QA upload... G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PGP key: https://www.ringlet.net/roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
