On Sun, 28 May 2006, Greg Alexander wrote: > Hello, > > Please, people, stop accepting that this package has to be > unnecessarily feature poor. > > Here is the state of things in the unzip 5.52-8 debian package: > (a) files <2GB yes > (b) files >2GB <4GB no > (c) files >4GB no > > Here is the state of things after Paul Slootman's patch: > (a) files <2GB yes > (b) files >2GB <4GB yes > (c) files >4GB no
I see it differently: (a) files <2GB yes (b) files >2GB <4GB unsure (c) files >4GB no Question for Paul: Your patch changes a few typedefs. How do I know that those changes are enough? [ I would feel better, for example, if just adding `getconf LFS_CFLAGS` to CFLAGS would make gcc to issue some warnings, and those warnings would disappear by applying the patch (which changes some typedefs). However, gcc does not issue any warning ]. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
