Hello Paul,
We are working on migrating ROCm stack in Debian to >= 7.2.3, leveraging the
work has been done in Ubuntu.
We started working on the migration already and packages are already being
updated in salsa it is just matter of time
for the packages below to land in Debian Experimental first and then propagate.
```
| Package | Salsa debian/experimental | Debian Experimental | Debian
Unstable |
| -------------- | ------------------------- | ------------------- |
--------------- |
| amdsmi | 7.2.3-1~exp1 | 7.2.3-1~exp1 | 7.2.0-3
|
| hipify | 7.2.4+dfsg-1~exp1 | — |
7.0.2+dfsg-1 |
| rocm-cmake | 7.2.4-1~exp1 | — | 6.4.3-1
|
| rocm-core | 7.2.4-1~exp1 | 6.4.4-1~exp6 | —
|
| rocm-smi-lib | 7.2.4-1~exp2 UNREL | 7.2.4-1~exp1 | 6.4.1-1.1
|
| rocm-llvm | 7.2.4+dfsg-1~exp1 | 7.2.4+dfsg-1~exp1 |
7.0.2+dfsg-3 |
| rocr-runtime | 7.2.4+dfsg-1~exp1 | 7.2.3+dfsg-1~exp1 |
6.4.3+dfsg-5 |
```
These are only the packages in dependency group 1 but sharing to report some
progress on the work we are taking
under.
Best regards,
Talha
> On 2 Jun 2026, at 20:23, Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:04:09 +0200 Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 23:41:10 +0200 Christian Kastner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > therefore filing with severity:
>> > serious to prevent migration to testing.
>> A bunch of things happened in the rocm stack last months. Do you still think
>> this bug still correctly block rocm-hiparmd from migrating to testing? If
>> yes, is there a plan to resolve this in the near future? This package is
>> trying to migrate to testing for 69 days now.
>
> Ping.
>
> Paul
