Hi, 在 2026/6/2 15:07, Emma Müller 写道: > Thank you for forwarding to upstream. I read the comment “Thank you for your > complaints about a 25 year old software package on a random other site. I > particularly appreciate the effort Emma put into proposing a fix to the > code.” of the upstream maintainer. He seems to have generated his prior fixes > with AI (Claude Opus 4.6, hence the questionable behavior), and in his > comment, he tries to be sarcastic for no good reason: Debian BTS is not > “random”, and a plain user is not expected to suggest fixes. It wouldn't > surprise me if the aforementioned quotation was also AI-generated. > > I looked into his other comments on the closed bug reports, and they were on > topic. Any idea what to do if the upstream maintainer is clearly not that > well?
Upstream first, do nice communicate to upstream author is better. Certainly, we are all volunteer in open source project, upstream author sometimes perhaps wouldn't fix some bugs. Debian bugreport is public, perhaps some people would contribute a patch. >> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mikalstill/pngtools/issues/37 Wishes! -- 肖盛文 xiao sheng wen -- Debian Developer(atzlinux) Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40debian.org GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
