Am Dienstag, den 04.07.2006, 23:15 +0300 schrieb Jari Aalto+mail.linux: > | Am Montag, den 03.07.2006, 23:38 +0300 schrieb Jari Aalto: > | > Package: debbugs > | > Severity: wishlist > | > > | > There is need for different tag for cases where the user as misunderstood > | > or he didn't found the correct documentation. Marking such bugs 'closed' > | > would better have tag 'notbug'. The 'wontfix' is really interpreted > | > as 'I don't gime a d--m' as expressed in Debian devel. > | > | I would also like to see such a tag. I observed (and also reported :)) > | such "bugs", which are not bugs. > | > | > This is Feature request based on idea of Linas Evirblis in Debian > | > devel. > | > | Wouldn't it be better to call this tag 'notabug'? IMO this is better > | understandable und also used in other BTS systems like e.g. bugzilla. > > While that would be "English clean" name with an article "A", the tool > in BTS is for technical use.
True. But we also use e.g. "fixed-in-experimental" and several other tags, which are "clear" regarding their meaning. > To my opinion > > "not bug" > > better and expresses the extra meaning. Like in programming > langauges: > > ! variable > ! error > > Or > not variable > not error The readers and users of the BTS are humans, not machines. But however this tag will be called, I would just like to see this tag. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
