On Tue, July 4, 2006 2:36 am, Junichi Uekawa said: > Hi, > >> > this bug is 3.5 years old and I can't reproduce it here with current >> > user-mode-linux package (iow, the slirp backend works here). >> > >> > Can some of you still reproduce it? If not (or if no answer comes) >> I'll >> > close this bug in a couple of weeks. >> >> I thought the bug was closed by the message date 04 Apr 2003 from the >> then maintainer Matt Zimmerman. So, in particular, I have not >> followed through on this bug. In fact, I have not used UML for quite >> a while. So I have no objections to closing this bug. > > I think the discussion was like, building UML with gcc 3.X broke one > part and 3.Y broke another part, so each release of UML had different > parts functional, different parts non-functional.
yes, there was also gcc 2.95 in the game, (3.2 and 3.3 were the others) > That was the old days; not quite sure if things have progressed too > much. well, the official compiler for the linux kernel is now gcc >= 3.2 so at least _one_ step ahead should have happened. -- mattia :wq!
