On Tue, Jul 04, 2006, Youssef Chahibi wrote: > Package: ttf-farsiweb > Version: 0.4-4 > > > Compared with the farsi_fonts_0.4.tar.bz2 archive provided by Arabeyes > (http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot), ttf-farsiweb misses the > following fonts: elham koodak roya royab terafik terafikb .
I redid the package and here is what linda claims: % linda -i /home/adn/Projects/Debian/Results/ttf-farsiweb/0.4.ds1-1/ttf-farsiweb_0.4.ds1-1_i386.changes W: ttf-farsiweb; The font ttf-farsiweb-0.4.ds1/koodak.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a commonly available font. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font ttf-farsiweb-0.4.ds1/roya.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font ttf-farsiweb-0.4.ds1/royab.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font ttf-farsiweb-0.4.ds1/terafik.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font ttf-farsiweb-0.4.ds1/terafikb.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-farsiweb/koodak.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-farsiweb/roya.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-farsiweb/royab.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-farsiweb/terafik.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. W: ttf-farsiweb; The font /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-farsiweb/terafikb.ttf in package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. It seems that the fonts are already available somewhere else. Am I mistaken somewhere? -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette
