Hello Arto, Am 07.03.26 um 08:45 schrieb Arto Jantunen:
The upstream author has defined the preferred license as GPLv3+, even though the file content includes the strings "license" and "ISC", which the tool interprets as having a meaning that it does not have (it is not the license of the file, it is the license of the typescript package being described, which does not exist and isn't meant to exist as the file is a test fixture of an application licensed under the GPL).
And who is the author of the two files? The upstream author cannot ignore the license of that two files, esp. if s(he) isn't the author of the two files.
Only the author(s) of the two files can decide what the meaning is not a maintainer or anyone else.
So all used license have to be list in d/copyright. See 2.3 in the Debian Policy.
Regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
