Hi,

On 3/5/26 07:49, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Is all that is needed to change llvm-dev (< 1:20~) to llvm-dev (<= 1:21~)?


If your package has significant build time tests and you don't know that newer versions of llvm-dev are actually broken, instead I suggest to use *unversioned* B-D and let QA report issues when they occur.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to