Source: nsxiv Version: 33-1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Echeverry <[email protected]>, [email protected], Package Salvaging Team <[email protected]>
Hi, when checking bug #1082303 I realised that it seems we have kind of a decision about the prefered fork for sxiv. If it is really a drop in replacement it should feature some Provides: sxiv and use the alternatives mechanism to provide the binary. This can be later become Replaces: sxiv Conflicts: sxiv in case we might decide to remove sxiv and nsxiv would provide the same executable name. For sure this is up for discussion but by opening this bug report I would like to create a place where this can be discussed. Kind regards Andreas. -- System Information: Debian Release: forky/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (50, 'buildd-unstable'), (50, 'unstable'), (5, 'experimental'), (1, 'buildd-experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.17.13+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=de_DE:de Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
