On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 12:07:32AM +0200, Carl Keinath wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:35:31 +0100 Gregor Riepl <[email protected]> wrote: > > This issue would probably be fixed by an update to the latest upstream > > release. > > But there's significant work to be done: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068248 > > all deps are currently in NEW, when they are in unstable I am going to > package a more recent version of ruff.
Is that still the case and your plan? From a cursory look, I think at least a few of the packages listed in #1068248 (#55) are now part of the archive, but I don't know what the full list is. If this FTBFS (#1074734) is indeed fixable by a new upstream (#1068248), and in turn blocked by NEW packages, you could probably do: block 1074734 by 1068248 block 1068248 by ITP#1 block 1068248 by ITP#2 ... My understanding from the latest "Bits from the DFSG team"[1], "Blocking Bugs" -> "bonus points" is that this could help in prioritizing the processing of some of these NEW packages. Thanks, Faidon 1: <[email protected]>
