Hello, Andrea Pappacoda [02/Jan 2:18pm +01] wrote: > Hi all, > >> Il giorno 1 gen 2026, alle ore 00:56, Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> If the source name of git-merge-changelog below causes confusion, maybe >> we could use upstream's other name 'vc-changelog' however as far as I >> understand, 'vc-changelog' is an umbrella project that currently is only >> hosting the 'git-merge-changelog' sub-project, so this is not ideal. > > What about naming the source package “vc-changelog”, and have it produce the > git-merge-changelog binary package?
Possibly the name "VC" in this context comes from Emacs's VC package. The developers of gnulib and Emacs overlap a fair bit. (I don't know if this comment helps any decision making, but I thought I'd note it.) -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
