Guillem Jover writes ("Re: Bug#1123652: 1.0 with diff, dpkg-source -x no longer 
chmod +x debian/rules"):
> For any other source format that can convey the permissions, I consider
> the above commits to still be good, because that implies something that
> should be fixed anyway in the source tree, and otherwise they get fixed
> and warned about during build.

I don't think this is correct.  What about exissting source pavkages
that don't specify executability of debian/rules in their diffs?

I haven't done a complete search of snapshot.d.o or anything but it
seems likely that there are a nonzero number of existing source
packages broken by this change.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <[email protected]>   These opinions are my own.  

Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Reply via email to