Le mer 28 juin 2006 17:28, James Vega a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:08:27AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:02:12AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > > Except it'll actually include the '.' in the second collection. > > > :) > > Additionally you might make sure it isn't entirely numeric; I don't > > know if this is codified anywhere official, but causes problems > > minimally for the BTS rewrites; > I think this is a bit beyond the scope of the syntax highlighting and > at first glance isn't a trivial thing to add. oh yes it is: \([0-9][a-z0-9+-.]*[a-z+-.][a-z0-9+-.]*\|[a-z][a-z0-9+-.]\+\) should do it. but I reckon it's pervert, and agree it's beyond syntax highligthing scope. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpoGDaenKL3U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
