On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:47:24AM +0200, Marc Dequènes wrote: > Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I had the impression that since amd64 is a release architecture, such > > bugs should be grave, but I might be mistaken. That it is a known bug in > > the Soya library means you should reassign this bug to soya of course. > Like FTBFS, it is severity "serious" AFAIK (which is still RC btw). A binary package that's unusable on the architecture it's built for is 'grave'. An arch: all package (like balazar) that isn't usable on one particular arch may be serious (if the maintainer thinks it's a blocker for the release), or it may be important, or it may be wishlist... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
