Hi Cory, On 2025-11-20 07:04, Cordell Bloor wrote: > On 2025-11-19 09:18, Florent 'Skia' Jacquet wrote: > Thanks for looking into this. Instability in the compiler has been an > ongoing theme with ROCm on ppc64el. > > Christian, your ggml package is the primary reverse dependency affected. > While amd64 and arm64 can be binNMU'd, I think we might have trouble > with ppc64el for a while. As I understand it, our options are basically > to fix the bug in LLVM, find a workaround in rocblas, or RM rocblas > rdepends on ppc64el. Do you have any preferences on how to proceed?
Seeing as all other ROCm packages have migrated to testing now, rocblas remains the last show-stopper for ggml. Regardless of ggml (which no longer depends rocblas on ppc64el), rocblas won't migrate to testing without a successful ppc64el build, as it has previously successfully built. So if rocblas on ppc64el should no longer be supported, then this state needs to be cleared (I don't immediately recall the process, I think the RT is responsible). Best, Christian
