Hi Adrian, On 2025-12-09 19:45, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Dec 07, 2025 at 10:30:02PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Aurelien, > > > On 2025-12-07 19:42, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >... > > We might probably need to wait for more than that, as people doesn't > > necessary upgrade to the latest point release just before trying to > > upgrade to forky. We probably want to wait up to the next point release > > for safety and avoid breaking many systems. > >... > > I just realized that 2.41-12 in stable was still in unstable before 2.42. > > As soon as trixie-pu contains a 2.41-12+deb13u1 with the fix+symbol, > both the symbol version and the forced dependency could be lowered > to 2.41-12+deb13u1 and this should then properly cover everything > in trixie/forky/sid including stale packages.
I am not sure why you insist about involving a change in trixie to fix this bug. I would really like that we have more feedback about that change before rushing this change to stable. On the other hand, the binutils bug is already fixed, and the dpkg-shlibdeps change is queued for the next dpkg upload. I am still planning an upload to trixie for the next point release, as there are other things to fix. > >.... > > The issue has been there for 1.5 month, and to the best of my knowledge > > nobody noticed that, even in other distributions. > >... > > Debian/Ubuntu might be the only distributions using a snapshot from the > master branch of binutils? This is also in the stable branch and in the 2.45.1 release. Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://aurel32.net
