On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 10:54:59AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi Stephen, thanks for answering.
> I checked with 2.44-3+12+b1 too, and that works correctly (can you confirm?), Yes quite probably. > so this is a regression in 2.45. I’ll bisect to see where the issue comes > from. I upgraded against (to 2.45.50.20251125-1+12.1+b1) and it seem to work correctly. (Sorry I was a bit confused by binutils-mingw-w64-i686 versioning scheme). Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
