Daniel, that was it. It might be worthile (ignore if this is a dumb suggestion, I owe you anyway!) to have some bug as a placholder for ppl like me to find it. I did not see the bug you referenced, although I think I looked at the web site for some time and had a look at quite a few reports.
So, purging xfonts-base helped here, and some more cleaning up as the report you gave suggested. You can close this case. Sorry for creating extra work, I merely did not know where to look. I should get my hands more dirty next time, sorry. Thanks lots, Alexander On Tue, 27 June 2006 19:11:06 +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0200, Alexander Koch wrote: > > this might look like #261634 but that one is from ages back > > and he uses imagemacgick 5:xxx. I use the latest verion, and > > I have to admit I am clueless as to where (perfectly possible) > > something is wrong here. This happened after an upgrade to > > unstable yesterday. > > Despite the stunning absence of information about what the actual > problem is, from your subject I take it that this is another instance of > #363371 and #367485. Most likely, some of the FontPath settings in your > /etc/X11/xorg.conf still point to obsolete locations in /usr/lib. Please > have a look at the discussion in http://bugs.debian.org/363371 for > details and let us know whether this fixes the problems for you. If it > doesn't, please provide a bit more information about what's going wrong. > > Regards, > > Daniel. -- Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / ako4-ripe Peering Coordinator Tiscali/3257 Phone +49 6103 916 480, Fax +49 6103 916 464 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
