Hi Martin, On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 03:57:40PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > 2) I avoid changes to the upstream code like the plague. You've > > > already submitted the patch as a MR upstream and Roy has reacted to > > > it. We'll use whatever Roy ends up approving for that one.
That's just not a good enough level of support for a critical Debian base-system component. I will escalate this matter if you continue to maintain this position. > In the future, please avoid queued NMUs. Just file normal bugs and > wait a week or two for me to react to them. Not an option. This is standard Debian process. As maintainer you're expected to follow it. > > PS: Could you dcut that queued NMU and close this bug after that? :) Please note that since you uploaded 1:10.3.0-2 and the version number of my 10.3.0-1.1 NMU is lower than that it will get auto-REJECTED by ftp-master once it comes off the DEFERRED queue. I've cancelled it anyhow, but please make more efficient use of my limited Debian time in the future. > ping Seems you forgot to CC me on your responses. Please keep in mind that you should CC everyone involved on bugs since the BTS doesn't copy the submitter of bugs automatically (unfortunately). Usually I should get copies via my tracker subscription, but it seems that's broken right now. In any case you should no assume correspondents are subscribed that way. --Daniel
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
