On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 17:04:40 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 10:55:26 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> > But then I can still reproduce it from the git repo that I work with
> > usually, so I compared the logs from uscan -v, and I understand now
that
> > the difference is due to the presence of the upstream branch.
>
> I meant "upstream remote" and not "upstream branch", sorry for the awful
> confusion...
No problem. I knew what you meant to say.
I have a partial patch on Salsa [1] for a similar problem also using the
git upstream mode. [2]
The patch doesn't quite fix your bug, but `uscan -vv` debug output shows
the right actions are happening.
Hugh
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/594
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120533
