On 2025-11-18 19:14:35, Nicholas D. Steeves wrote:
> Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Hey folks, so this has been flying about for a couple of months now,
>> what's the current status?
>>
>> Is someone willing to own this bug and merge everything?
>>
>> I might take some time to do so in a week or two if no one else steps
>> up...
>
> I'd appreciate if you would review my WIP (which I finally pushed). In
> particular, I'd appreciate your perspective on that potential UX
> enhancement and am wondering if there's a better way to do it and to
> support upstream's efforts to make config migration less painful. The
> obvious downside to upstream's current implementation is that it erases
> comments in the config.
Hmm... I'm not sure. First, I think this should be gated on a `[ -d
/etc/borgmatic ]` otherwise it could crash the postinst on an
unconfigured system:
for i in /etc/borgmatic/*.yaml; do
Did you actually this in a clean install?
I'm not sure we should be doing this for our users though... It seems a
little daring! But why not...
>> And thank you for people for all the NMUs, we're lagging, but not that
>> far behind upstream, thanks to that awesome work...
>
> Would you like to be assimilated into the borg collective? ;)
Not particularly, in fact. I was part of the borg for a while, and I am
happy to have regained my individuality.
> As Andrej said, if you show up and do the work then you're part of the
> collective, and the project is under the salsa/collab-maint group so
> you already have access. I've been testing 2.0.9, but feel free to
> our package forward to 2.0.11 if you prefer.
Well, it's pretty much how the python team works too...
I see you have things well in hands, I'll leave you to it and bash at
this again if I see it needs a hand! :)
a.
--
Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided
missiles and misguided men.
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
