Package: mailutils-imap4d
Version: 1:3.20-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

randomly during

  $>  systemctl restart mailutils-imap4d.service

IMAP4 daemon does fail to (re-)start with

  $> journalctl -eu mailutils-imap4d

  systemd[1]: mailutils-imap4d.service: Scheduled restart job, restart counter 
is at 5.
  systemd[1]: mailutils-imap4d.service: Start request repeated too quickly.
  systemd[1]: mailutils-imap4d.service: Failed with result 'start-limit-hit'.
  systemd[1]: Failed to start mailutils-imap4d.service - GNU IMAP4 daemon.

It seems that the daemon does too often fail to come up.  I'm not sure
what the origin of the issue, but as work-around it works to set in

  * /usr/lib/systemd/system/mailutils-imap4d.service
  
    StartLimitBurst=0

I provide a patch as reply to this report.

Greets, Dirk.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 6.16.9+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/20 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages mailutils-imap4d depends on:
ii  libc6             2.41-12
ii  libcom-err2       1.47.2-3+b3
ii  libcrypt1         1:4.4.38-1
ii  libgnutls30t64    3.8.10-2
ii  libgsasl18        2.2.2-4
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2  1.21.3-5
ii  libk5crypto3      1.21.3-5
ii  libkrb5-3         1.21.3-5
ii  libldap2          2.6.10+dfsg-1
ii  libmailutils9t64  1:3.20-2
ii  libpam0g          1.7.0-5
ii  libunistring5     1.3-2
ii  libwrap0          7.6.q-36
ii  mailutils-common  1:3.20-2
ii  netbase           6.5

mailutils-imap4d recommends no packages.

Versions of packages mailutils-imap4d suggests:
pn  mailutils-mda  <none>

Attachment: 0001-debian-mailutils-imap4d.service-Prevent-failed-start.patch
Description: application/mbox

Reply via email to