Andree Leidenfrost said on Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:57:16PM +1000: > Thanks a lot for your feedback!
You're welcome. > Hm, I see what you mean, mountlist_line is 640 bytes + 1 long long int, > that's certainly too big to go to 65k entries. (s_tapecat_entry is much > smaller.) Yeah, just 42 MB for that is silly :-( > Maybe we double it to 8192 for starters? In that context, did you see my Yes. I think it's more reasonable as an interim proposal. > other message to this bug about the maximum filesize? Would increasing Yes, but I wasn't awake enough to understand it ;-) > the filesize make it so that less entries in the tape catalog would be > used because we'd have fewer archive files in the first place? Maybe > doubling the filesize AND doubling MAX_TAPECATALOG_ENTRIES would be the > way to go? As you have already looked at it, can we do that only for tapes ? What is the impact for CDs ? (I assume DVDs are not a problem). Bruno. -- Linux Profession Lead EMEA / Open Source Evangelist \ HP C&I EMEA IET http://www.mondorescue.org / HP/Intel Solution Center \ http://hpintelco.net Des infos sur Linux? http://www.HyPer-Linux.org http://www.hp.com/linux La musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org
pgpxt90ot5CZu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
