On 2006-06-23 John Belmonte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Westby wrote: [...] > > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, > > libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (>= 0.9.7), libgnutls11-dev, > > libnss3-dev > > +Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, > > libxml2-dev, libxslt1-dev, libssl-dev (>= 0.9.7), libgnutls-dev, libnss3-dev
> This violates best practice given by the Debian Library Packaging Guide: > <http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#id4732200> > <http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#id4732240> Yes, and no. The DLP describes the B-D of a package depending on something like this Package: libfoo42-dev Provides: libfoo-dev However for gnutls libgnutls-dev is no virtual package but a real one, there is no libgnutls13-dev. So it would not be xmlsec1 not implementing DLP but gnutls. > In any case, I will fix this bug once proper runtime testing has been > done against the new gnutls version. Thank you. cu andreas -- The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects, howsoever undertaken. (c) Jasper Ffforde -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
