[EMAIL PROTECTED](Rainer Zocholl) 15.06.06 23:33
Hello, what will happen now?
>[EMAIL PROTECTED](Daniel Burrows) 14.06.06 19:46
>> As I understand it, this is a feature request that "aptitude show"
>>should display the currently installed version by default?
>1st.
>At least it would be required that "aptitude show" does not
>declare the first found package as "State:installed"!
>That seems to be a bug because when one version is installed,
>"aptitude -v show" indicates all versions as "installed".
>2nd
>If an unknown parameter like "-t " is given, aptitude should
>give a warning like "ignored parameter '-t testing'"
>and not silently ignore it.
>i would expect that
>aptitude -t testing backupninja
>would show the "testeing" version
>and
>aptitude -t stable backupninja
>would show the "stable" version.
>or it should generate a warning or error.
>3rd (maybe needs discussion)
>If for an uninstalled package is asked, it should reply with the
>version which would be installed by default as defined
>in
>~# cat /etc/apt/apt.conf | grep -v "^//"
>APT::Architecture "i386";
>APT::Default-Release "stable";
>APT::Cache-Limit 16777216;
>If the package is already installed, it should
>show the installed version, not that versions that happens
>to be the that first in the package list.
>0th
>The first easiest step could be:
>remove the line " State:" line from Aptitude show output,
>as there is always the same for all versions of a package.
Rainer---<=====> Vertraulich
//
//
<=====>--------------ocholl, Kiel, Germany ------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
