Source: uqm Version: 0.8.0+dfsg-3.2 Severity: serious Justification: https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt ยง6a X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] User: [email protected] Usertags: riscv64 User: [email protected] Usertags: flaky Control: affects -1 + src:libsdl2
Similar to #1051783, the autopkgtest 'savegames' intermittently fails on ci.debian.net, especially on riscv64 (which has much slower hardware than the other architectures tested): https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/uqm/testing/riscv64/ but also occasionally on other architectures: https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/uqm/testing/armhf/ https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/uqm/testing/ppc64el/ The testing migration infrastructure assumes this is a regression in a package that was upgraded, preventing packages like libsdl2 from migrating to testing until the uqm autopkgtest is retried. If this test is expected to be unreliable, please mark it with "Restrictions: flaky" so that it isn't used to gate migrations from unstable to testing: Tests: savegames Restrictions: flaky Depends: ... Or, if it's only expected to pass on "fast" architectures, it could be limited to those architectures: Tests: savegames Architecture: amd64 Depends: ... Or it could be marked with the "skippable" restriction: Tests: savegames Restrictions: skippable Depends: ... and do its own logic to classify its results into three buckets: * success: exit 0 * skipped, expected/ignorable failure or other neutral status: exit 77 * failure: any other exit status Thanks, smcv
