Samuel, Sorry. This was my mistake. I had done a quick search for libortp-dev in the archive and in wnpp, but missed the fact that libortp4-dev was already provided by linphone..
I didn't mean to hijack your package, in fact it is a hijack from pkg-voip-maintainers to pkg-voip-maintainers, so I guess we need better co-ordination within the team. I certainly should of waited longer with the IPT/ debrelease. On Thursday 22 June 2006 01:45, Samuel Mimram wrote: > I did not intent to be rough, I was just very surprised to see someone > uploading a libortp without checking whether it was already in the > archive or not! I think it was simpler for us to have only one package. > However, I'm having second thoughts. Since it's already uploaded, it > might be nicer to have a separate package for libortp since we might > want to update the lib without updating linphone, etc. I'll do the > necessary changes when ortp is out of NEW. But please, next time, just > send a mail to the maintainer before hijacking a package... Sorry again. I didn't see there was already a package, which is why I didn't email yourself, but rather just emailed pkg-voip-maintainers. Mark
pgpbqmkE9XJtu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
