Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> (2025-08-03): > Well, the package is in firmware-nonfree; I would expect there is > flexibility in this rule. But surely, you know better than me. If > it's going to be rejected, I'll go via backports instead.
Even if one forgets about the rule, are you really that confident that nothing is going to break if we were to have that update available in (future) stable, compared to the current situation? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
