> Jim, can you confirm this? Hi Sebastian.
I'm happy to give it a go, but will need a bit of guidance since I'm not a Debian developer. I cloned the repo via `git clone https://salsa.debian.org/debian/openssl.git` , but I'm not sure what branch to go to before I try to revert those commits. I ran a `git tag -l` and I saw a tag for `debian/openssl-3.0.16-1_deb12u1` but not one for `debian/openssl-3.0.17-1_deb12u1` Do I just use the `debian/bookworm` branch instead? That's definitely version 3.0.17, but it might not have the deb12-u1 changes? I can't tell because the Debian changelog for the deb12u1 package wasn't updated. Or perhaps I'm just going about things in completely the wrong way? I also downloaded the source package by adding the following to my /etc/apt/sources.list file: ``` deb-src https://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates main non-free contrib ``` And then used `apt-get source openssl` to download the package source. But this isn't a git repository of course, so I don't know if there are Debian tools that can be used to give a git commit hash and have the tool revert it from the package source. Regards, Jim Barber On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 04:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 2 August 2025 17:24:36 CEST, Stefan Ehmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >If I revert > ><https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/340383f5f49f84ed802dac268e6c12971d837f75> > >(and also 7141330fb98ceab643729f2d0f445f79f26addce), ebook-convert works > >fine again. > > Jim, can you confirm this? > > > > >According to the comments, this is a bug in python. It is fixed in python > >3.13, but there won't be an upstream backport to older versions. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Pkg-openssl-devel mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-openssl-devel > > -- > Sebastian
