On 2025-07-25 Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> writes: [...]
> > * I doubt that a multi-year old version of liboqs (which is what you'd > > have in stable in a not too distant future) would be useful for > > experiments and testing. liboqs is pretty fast moving. You would want > > bleeding edge for experimenting. > My primary use-case for liboqs in stable is to setup interop testing > between different PQ libraries and help development of PQ libraries. > Having some OLD and stable release of liboqs widely available is what I > would prefer. I want to test that some other PQ crypto libraries are > able to interop with some old known-to-produce-correct-results liboqs. > So there is no need for this liboqs to be able to protect sensitive > data. It just have to produce something. Which seems to match what the > liboqs maintainers says it is good for. Hello, If there is a stable release of liboqs this indeed makes sense. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
