-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2025-07-22 at 08:43 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > > as already said, that's not an option for us. There's no plan to retire > > strongswan-charon (and strongswan-starter) packages. > > Why would you drop the alternate dependency in Forky then?
Because at some point I'd like that strongswan only dependency would be for charon-systemd and strongswan-swanctl. > > What should happen to users having strongswan and strongswan-charon > installed when upgrading to Forky? I think I would have expected strongswan to be upgraded, strongswan-charon (and strongswan-starter) removed and charon-systemd/strongswan-swanctl installed. It would have been better to have the package co-installable but they bind on the same port so that doesn't really make sense. > > Btw. there is currently a new solver in apt that would remove > strongswan-charon and install charon-systemd instead. That will likely > become the default in Forky so it could work without a transition dummy > package then. That would be nice, yes. > > In any case, I would propose to add the alternate dependency for Trixie > and do do an upload soon as time is running out. I guess so… - -- Yves-Alexis -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmh/t4gACgkQ3rYcyPpX RFuvSAgAtFc/s/rDb91CcOMPR8W55GAYlbJHYlab+w+B2y0KgFdvkicRsF0FrmAI 3gXIzxhQWMgx8gbydhuntRflJxph14jZgE6D218lsoLVHftrtfF7UnQ40lfcYCRB SR7A2KtvxvtZ9xcozwyTyWaT+MNupfq+n/qAtJ3lfQjGV9AJN/H346Zr3nYEhKft hjxGDhwIYbCq6uDD0hLX2hhxNBUZuIQ3jmvO/MC6RLjwS4mRjKcydaOeQ0wvzK3m TA14vjtYzlaEvtYcSQp4aigwXF7SHUGV6IPmsYX0WH6SowsCl6B45zb641ddbG7v JIG7i2KX1MK6yo0c7IwPudB70wiZuw== =elR7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----