Hi Julian > No that's not how SRV records work or can even work.
I don't think we have the same understanding on "how SRV records work" then. however, ...
> You'd completely violate the basic premise of TLS encryption and > authenticity, allowing your local network operator to intercept > encrypted communications.no, as I've written it could mimic the same behaviour as 301 in HTTP(S) which obviously doesn't interfer with encryption at all.
but whatever. Regards, Daniel
