Hi Reiner, On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:10:25PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:04:00PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:11:09AM +0000, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Package: src:lua-lgi > > > thanks for bisecting. > But it seems to be inaccurate. We already found out (in the linked upstream > bug tracker) that pango 1.56.2 causes the regression.
Yeah, you're right. My earlier bisect failed due to unrelated reasons. The real result is: bisection finished successfully last good timestamp: 20250313T150353Z first bad timestamp: 20250313T210003Z the following packages differ between the last good and first bad timestamp: gir1.2-pango-1.0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 libcairo-gobject2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 libcairo-script-interpreter2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 libcairo2-dev:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 libcairo2:arm64 1.18.2-2 -> 1.18.4-1 libcap2:arm64 1:2.75-1 -> 1:2.75-2 libpango-1.0-0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 libpangocairo-1.0-0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 libpangoft2-1.0-0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 libpangoxft-1.0-0:arm64 1.56.1-1 -> 1.56.2-1 libpython3.13-minimal:arm64 3.13.2-1 -> 3.13.2-2 libpython3.13-stdlib:arm64 3.13.2-1 -> 3.13.2-2 libsystemd0:arm64 257.4-2 -> 257.4-3 libudev1:arm64 257.4-2 -> 257.4-3 python3.13 3.13.2-1 -> 3.13.2-2 python3.13-minimal 3.13.2-1 -> 3.13.2-2 Chris
