On Sat, Jul 05, 2025 at 03:17:51PM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 09:07:05PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 12:40:14PM +0000, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > > This version doesn't seem to be uploaded to unstable. In case this unblock > > > requests was meant as a pre-approval request: > > > > Yes, that was the idea. I was under the impression that pre-approvals > > were preferred, but if that's not the case I can start with the > > upload next time. Or maybe I should have just mentioned this :) > > Well, people usually mention that it's a pre-approval request.
Yeah, it's completely obvious in retrospect. My bad for not mentioning it. I'll make sure not to make the same mistake in the future. > If the change is a small targeted fix that can easily be reverted if > necessary, then there isn't much risk in a direct upload. If the change is > bigger, not in line with the freeze policy, or if a revert would be > inconvenient, it might be better to ask for pre-approval. Makes sense. Personally I'd rather not upload anything to unstable if there's a (foreseeable) chance that it will have to be reverted, so the pre-approval approach still suits me better. > > > Please go ahead with the upload and remove the moreinfo tag from this > > > unblock > > > request once the new upload has been in unstable for a few days, and you > > > think > > > it's ready to migrate. > > > > Upload done. I'll remove the tag in a few days. > > Unblocked. Thank you! -- Andrea Bolognani <e...@kiyuko.org> Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
