Hello,

On Thu 03 Jul 2025 at 09:51pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:

> It looks like the upstream discussion[1] may still go on for a while:
> the direction has consensus, while the details of the functions are
> still under discussion.
>
> In the meantime, I wonder whether we can move forward on the Debian side
> and have this in Trixie (with an unblock request), which will help users
> who upgrade from Bookworm avoid surprises when older versions of addons
> are installed.  My branch[2] is updated to the latest version of
> upstream bug.  Patches are also attached.

I don't think the full change is appropriate for trixie, and I would
like to see the upstream changes committed to Emacs 31 before
backporting them here.

I think though that we could add the necessary dependency relations
manually to deal with potentially broken upgrades.  There is no need to
do every built-in package, right?  We just need to add values for those
built-in packages that were RM'd for trixie?

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to