Hello, On Thu 03 Jul 2025 at 09:51pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote:
> It looks like the upstream discussion[1] may still go on for a while: > the direction has consensus, while the details of the functions are > still under discussion. > > In the meantime, I wonder whether we can move forward on the Debian side > and have this in Trixie (with an unblock request), which will help users > who upgrade from Bookworm avoid surprises when older versions of addons > are installed. My branch[2] is updated to the latest version of > upstream bug. Patches are also attached. I don't think the full change is appropriate for trixie, and I would like to see the upstream changes committed to Emacs 31 before backporting them here. I think though that we could add the necessary dependency relations manually to deal with potentially broken upgrades. There is no need to do every built-in package, right? We just need to add values for those built-in packages that were RM'd for trixie? -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature