Hi, On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 12:17 AM Antonio Russo <aeru...@aerusso.net> wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > While it would be nice to get this bug fixed for trixie, this > bug only occurs in specific situations, and has been present > and well-characterized for years. Removing zfs would be > more disruptive to users than leaving this bug in trixie. > > I think that someone should be making the deliberate decision > to remove zfs from trixie, rather than letting the autoremoval > process take zfs out of trixie. > > Please feel free to set this back to grave if that is what > you want. >
Want to note that the progress of making this fix land in Trixie is tracked in the unblock request at Bug #1108224, which is handled by Harry. The release team is busy before release please allow them for more time to process the request. Regards, Aron
